Security measures outside the Gyanvapi mosque intensified following the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report confirming the existence of a large Hindu temple before the current structure.
In light of the ASI report revealing evidence of Hindu temples, today's Jumma at the disputed Gyanvapi mosque holds significant importance. Strict security measures were implemented to prevent any untoward incidents.
Media was intentionally kept at a distance to maintain calm during the peaceful execution of the Friday prayer, aiming to avoid misinformation or unnecessary panic.
Conscious efforts were made to manage potential conflicts in the area.
The ASI report disclosed that a pre-existing structure was destroyed in the 17th century, with part of it modified and reused in the current structure. The report states, "Based on scientific studies/ survey carried out... it can be said that there existed a Hindu temple prior to the construction of the existing structure."
The Arabic-Persian inscription found inside a room mentions that the mosque was built in the 20th regnal year of Aurangzeb (1676-77 CE). Hence, the pre-existing structure appears to have been destroyed in the 17th century, during the reign of Aurangzeb, and part of it was modified and reused in the existing structure. Based on scientific studies/ survey carried out, study of architectural remains, exposed features and artefacts, inscriptions, art and sculptures, it can be said that there existed a Hindu temple prior to the construction of the existing structure: the ASI said in its report.
Based on the scientific studies and observations on central chamber and main entrance of the pre-existing structure in existing structure, western chamber and western wall, reuse of pillars and pilasters of pre-existing structure in the existing structure, inscriptions on the existing structure, Arabic and Persian inscription on the loose stone, sculptural remains in cellars, etc.,it can be said that there existed a large Hindu temple, prior to the construction of the existing structure, the report further said.
The ASI survey, ordered by the district court, was prompted by Hindu petitioners claiming the 17th-century Gyanvapi mosque was constructed over a pre-existing temple.
0 Comments